Tsp patch

Note: If you contribute tax-exempt pay, your total contributions from all types of pay must not exceed the IRS annual addition limit for the year.

For more information, visit Contribution Limits. Contribution types Regular employee contributions Each pay period, your agency or service will deduct your contribution from your basic salary in the amount or percentage that you chose when you started contributing. Your agency or service will continue to deduct your contribution until you do the following: Make a new election changing the amount Elect to stop your contributions Reach the IRS contribution limit.

With that solution, it would be easier to manage versioning for the main source tree : a new release with a new CVS tag will be made only when the sources of the software change. For the packaging, we would pick up the correct packaging files and the packaging CVS module and apply it to the desired sources.

So OK for not naming it 0. However you need a minimal branch in order to keep it away from HEAD. Indeed,the TSP software doesn't change but only the packaging. So because there is no changes on the software, I think the tag 0. That's why I'd propose to release a RPM 0. Are we OK with: - Branching 0. Considering the 0. If this operation is done in the RPM postinstall script, when the shared libs are installed there are directely locatable by the binaries without any manual action.

Note : I know that this modification would be acceptable only for the 0. But on my project it is not possible to use a CVS version for our production environment. After a discussion with Frederik, I know that it would be not very intersting for you to release a 0. But do you think it would be possible to release a version 2 for the RPM? I'd really like to try your beta and see if I can patch the language service in vs I'd definitely appreciate the beta testing, thanks!

Though, I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean by "patching the language service". Essentially, it makes it so that you can supply AST transformers in the tsconfig.

These transformers only get run during the file emit process that occurs after compilation. A language service plugin is primarily created to extend hints, code completion, etc. It can also be used to remove diagnostics. Where that becomes powerful is in that it could allow you to augment the language itself.

Example: making decorators work on functions, object variable declarations, and object properties. This is actually technically possible already with v1 by using a program transformer and a language service plugin, together, but the configuration would be a little cumbersome. TS natively supports language service plugins! You can just add them to the plugins section of tsconfig. You can have both tsp and LS plugins at the same time.

I'm assuming that the transformers need to be specified in the config when building the compiler, but do not need to be specified when using the compiler, is this correct? Not sure I understand what you mean, here. We are also going to move away from specifying these packages in tsconfig though legacy support will remain for v1 and tts packages. I'm planning to specify them in tsp. In many ways tsp will function like the yarn cli app, keeping everything clean and wired up properly when executed.

It will also track file modification dates, config hashes, etc, to make sure that it only rebuilds cached ts libs when necessary. I think I've misunderstood something basic about using ts-patch - although this doesn't change my ability to use it. Essentially I was hoping to be able to ship a version of tsc internally that is not only patched to be able to use transformers, but is also shipped with several transformers, a language service plugin and an addition to lib.

It seems that ts-patch actually generates a version of tsc that can then be extended using a config file. While this is fine, it does mean that I need to copy my transformers and configuration settings into every project that's using my custom compiler setup. As for "patching the language service in VS" patch might have been the wrong term.

I essentially was going to make a custom sdk featuring a version of tsc. Would there be a way for me to copy my transformers and config into the outputted cache so that it's automatically included when using the generated tsc. Giffork nonara. It sounds like you a progrmatic interface for ts-patch would suit your needs. A conceptual suggestion. Griffork Sounds like v2 would suit that use case nicely. You could do it the standard way with a package that contained all of your transformers and your language plugin.

In your package, you can include a setup script, which is triggered post-install. The script would init tsp config, perform the patch, and add your lib. With that route, you simply install ts, then install your package, and your project will be ready to go. For most, I would recommend that route, because it allows TS to update, and the patching persists.

However, if you wanted to bake it in directly, you could also create a module with a patch. This would let you build your transformers and LS directly into the ts libraries.

You could then publish the end result to a private repository, which would be your customized version of TS. I could see this making sense for some organizations! The TSP cannot accept traditional tax-exempt contributions toward the catch-up limit. You also cannot contribute toward the catch-up limit from incentive pay, special pay, or bonus pay.

If you are contributing to both a civilian and uniformed services account, the limits apply to the total you contribute to both accounts during the year.